Files
verdande/internal/store
Kristian WindandClaude Opus 5 726a489a67
Release / Build and publish image (push) Failing after 10m0s
fix(migrations): say why foreign keys go off, accurately
The note on 0009 and 0012 said the drop would cascade and take every row with it.
It would not: nothing references `activity` or `attachments`, so dropping either
takes nothing along. That claim was carried over from 0008, where seven tables do
reference `tasks` and it is exactly right.

The real reason is the check that comes with the marker. With foreign keys on, the
copy is validated a row at a time against a half-rebuilt schema, and the first bad
row aborts with no idea how many others are like it. With them off,
`PRAGMA foreign_key_check` runs once before the commit and names what is actually
wrong — which matters, because these run against a live database on somebody's
next restart and a failed migration is a server that does not start.

The upgrade test now carries activity rows, an attachment and a group across all
five migrations rather than stopping at 0008, and checks that the columns added by
ALTER arrived with their defaults rather than as NULL.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 10:01:18 +02:00
..