Meldt ind som "AI-informationerne gemmes ikke". De blev gemt. De blev taget bagefter. `user_settings` blev oprettet med `user_id` som hele sin primærnøgle — én række per person, uanset scope — og upserten skrev `scope` om ved konflikt. Der er tre scopes i live: `ai`, `gmail` og `calendar`. De delte den ene række, så hver skrivning slettede de to andre, og hver eneste svarede 204. Det virker begge veje: at forbinde kalenderen slettede Gmail-forbindelsen, og Gmail slettede kalenderen. Fælden var set komme to gange. 0011 gav instansens indstillinger deres egen tabel delvis af den grund og skrev advarslen ned med rene ord; 0014 flyttede postkasserne ud og skrev, at advarslen "nær var trådt i for anden gang". Tredje gang var kalenderen, som lagde et `calendar`-scope ved siden af de to andre. Lektien værd at holde fast i: en advarsel i en migration bliver læst af den, der redigerer *den* migration, og det var ingen. Formen er rettet her, så der ikke er noget tilbage at advare om — `PRIMARY KEY (user_id, scope)`, og upserten rammer den nøgle. Tabellen bygges om, fordi SQLite ikke kan ændre en primærnøgle på plads. De rækker, der findes, kopieres som de er: hver person har højst én, og den holder det scope, der vandt sidst. Det, de tidligere skrivninger tog, er overskrevet og kan ikke hentes tilbage her — efter opdateringen skal AI-udbyderen sættes op igen, og Gmail-forbindelsen tjekkes. To prøver: én mod store-laget, hvor formen var fejlen, og én gennem handlerne, hvor den blev set. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
189 lines
5.9 KiB
Go
189 lines
5.9 KiB
Go
package store
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"encoding/json"
|
|
"path/filepath"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/kristianwind/verdande/internal/secret"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// The whole point of the exercise: what is written must not be readable in the
|
|
// file that a backup copies.
|
|
func TestATokenIsNotStoredInTheClear(t *testing.T) {
|
|
db, userID := sealedStore(t)
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
const token = "1//0-a-real-looking-refresh-token"
|
|
if err := db.SetUserSettings(ctx, userID, "gmail", map[string]any{
|
|
"refresh_token": token,
|
|
"label": "Verdande",
|
|
}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var raw string
|
|
if err := db.QueryRowContext(ctx,
|
|
`SELECT values_json FROM user_settings WHERE user_id = ?`, userID).Scan(&raw); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if strings.Contains(raw, token) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("the token is in the row as written: %s", raw)
|
|
}
|
|
// The rest stays readable, which is the reason for naming the secret fields
|
|
// rather than sealing the whole blob.
|
|
if !strings.Contains(raw, "Verdande") {
|
|
t.Errorf("the label was sealed too: %s", raw)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
back, err := db.UserSettings(ctx, userID, "gmail")
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if back["refresh_token"] != token {
|
|
t.Errorf("got %q back", back["refresh_token"])
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The migration that matters. A row written before there was a key must still be
|
|
// readable, and must put itself away sealed the next time it is written — nobody
|
|
// should have to reconnect a mailbox because the server learned to encrypt.
|
|
func TestATokenWrittenBeforeTheKeyStillWorks(t *testing.T) {
|
|
db, userID := sealedStore(t)
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
const token = "1//0-written-when-there-was-no-key"
|
|
plain, _ := json.Marshal(map[string]any{"refresh_token": token})
|
|
if _, err := db.ExecContext(ctx, `
|
|
INSERT INTO user_settings (user_id, scope, values_json, updated_at)
|
|
VALUES (?, 'gmail', ?, 0)`, userID, string(plain)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
values, err := db.UserSettings(ctx, userID, "gmail")
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("a row from before the key could not be read: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if values["refresh_token"] != token {
|
|
t.Fatalf("got %q, want the plain token back", values["refresh_token"])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Written back — and now sealed, without anything having asked for it.
|
|
if err := db.SetUserSettings(ctx, userID, "gmail", values); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
var raw string
|
|
if err := db.QueryRowContext(ctx,
|
|
`SELECT values_json FROM user_settings WHERE user_id = ?`, userID).Scan(&raw); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if strings.Contains(raw, token) {
|
|
t.Error("the row is still in the clear after being written back")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The sweep finds people by the presence of a mailbox, so it must keep working
|
|
// now that the credential in it is ciphertext.
|
|
func TestTheSweepStillFindsAConnectedMailbox(t *testing.T) {
|
|
db, userID := sealedStore(t)
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
if err := db.SaveMailbox(ctx, &Mailbox{
|
|
UserID: userID, Kind: "gmail", RefreshToken: "1//0-token",
|
|
}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
users, err := db.UsersWithMailboxes(ctx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(users) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("the sweep found %d people with mailboxes, want 1", len(users))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func sealedStore(t *testing.T) (*DB, string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
db, err := Open(filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "test.db"))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
t.Cleanup(func() { db.Close() })
|
|
|
|
box, err := secret.Open("", t.TempDir())
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
db.UseSecrets(box)
|
|
|
|
user := &User{Email: "kristian@example.dk", Name: "Kristian"}
|
|
if err := db.CreateUser(context.Background(), user, "Indbakke"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
return db, user.ID
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Three integrations, one person, and none of them may delete the others.
|
|
//
|
|
// `user_settings` had `user_id` as its whole primary key and an upsert that
|
|
// rewrote `scope` on conflict, so every person had exactly one settings row and
|
|
// the last write won the lot: saving an AI provider deleted the Gmail connection,
|
|
// and connecting a calendar deleted the AI provider. The write reported success
|
|
// each time, which is why it was reported as "the AI settings are not saved"
|
|
// rather than as "connecting the calendar deleted them".
|
|
//
|
|
// Written against the store rather than the handlers, because the shape was the
|
|
// bug: every caller was correct on its own.
|
|
func TestOnePersonCanHaveSettingsForMoreThanOneThing(t *testing.T) {
|
|
db, userID := sealedStore(t)
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
want := map[string]map[string]any{
|
|
"ai": {"provider": "anthropic", "model": "claude-sonnet-5", "api_key": "sk-ant-xxx"},
|
|
"gmail": {"refresh_token": "1//0-gmail", "label": "Verdande"},
|
|
"calendar": {"refresh_token": "1//0-calendar", "calendar_id": "primary"},
|
|
}
|
|
// In this order on purpose: the AI settings are written first and read last,
|
|
// so a scope that steals the row is caught by the one written earliest.
|
|
for _, scope := range []string{"ai", "gmail", "calendar"} {
|
|
if err := db.SetUserSettings(ctx, userID, scope, want[scope]); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("save %s: %v", scope, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, scope := range []string{"ai", "gmail", "calendar"} {
|
|
got, err := db.UserSettings(ctx, userID, scope)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("read %s: %v", scope, err)
|
|
}
|
|
for key, value := range want[scope] {
|
|
if got[key] != value {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s.%s is %v, want %v", scope, key, got[key], value)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// And a second write to one scope updates it rather than adding another row —
|
|
// the upsert still has to upsert.
|
|
if err := db.SetUserSettings(ctx, userID, "ai", map[string]any{"provider": "openai"}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
var rows int
|
|
if err := db.QueryRowContext(ctx,
|
|
`SELECT count(*) FROM user_settings WHERE user_id = ?`, userID).Scan(&rows); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if rows != 3 {
|
|
t.Errorf("the person has %d settings rows, want 3", rows)
|
|
}
|
|
back, err := db.UserSettings(ctx, userID, "ai")
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if back["provider"] != "openai" {
|
|
t.Errorf("the second write did not land: %v", back["provider"])
|
|
}
|
|
}
|