3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Kristian WindandClaude Opus 5	c2e2d66e76	feat(admin): keep server errors where a restart cannot take them ... The panel's watcher reported four 5xx today — twice from one address at 11:49, twice from another at 10:45 — and there is no way to find out what any of them were. verdande logs the real cause of every 500, but on a Rune the log belongs to the container and the container is replaced on every restart. So an operator is told that something broke and given nothing to act on, which is the worst of both: alarming and useless. Every 500 now writes a row: what the handler was attempting in its own words, the error it hit, the method and path, who was asking, and the request id that ties it back to the log line for whoever still has it. The "what" is the part a status code cannot give — "list projects" and "move task" are the difference between a fault you can find and one you can only count. Written best-effort and never checked. This is the path that is already reporting a failure, and a diagnostic that can itself fail the request would turn one broken screen into two. Threading the request through `internal()` and `storeError()` touched 108 call sites across 19 files, which is the price of not having had it there from the start. It is mechanical and the compiler checked all of it. Kept for thirty days by the nightly sweep: long enough to answer "what happened last week", short enough that a fault loop cannot fill the volume the tasks live on. Read at Indstillinger → Fejl, administrators only — it carries paths, account names and the server's own error strings. The empty state says "Ingen fejl registreret. Det er den rigtige tilstand", because a blank panel should not read as a broken one. The test drops a table and asks for the endpoint that reads it: the same code path a disk error takes, and the row that comes back has to name the operation, the account and the request. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-17 22:58:02 +02:00
Kristian WindandClaude Opus 5	78ec9b08a1	fix: say the true thing when Gmail, AI or mail is not set up ... Two bugs with one shape: the interface confidently told you something that was not so. Connecting Gmail without a registered OAuth client said "Det er der allerede." Thirteen different situations answered a plain `conflict`, and the frontend renders that as "that already exists" — which for four of them is not vague but wrong. An unconfigured Gmail is not a Gmail that is already connected; a second factor that is off is not one that is on; the Inbox is not a project that already exists somewhere else. Those four have their own codes now, and their own sentences. The mail-to-task address came out as todo+…@localhost. VERDANDE_SMTP_FROM defaults to verdande@localhost and the domain was taken from it unconditionally, so an instance with no mail server handed out an address that looks real, can never receive anything, and gives no hint which of the two it is. The default no longer wins over the public hostname, and the response now carries whether a mail server exists at all — because even with the right domain, nothing routes to it until one does. errors.go has always claimed the code list is kept in one place "so the frontend's mapping can be checked against it". Nothing checked it, and the mapping was missing bad_request. Now a test reads both files and fails on a code with no message. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-17 14:35:36 +02:00
Kristian WindandClaude Opus 5	1bb644f4d1	feat(api): authentication — login, two-step TOTP, invites and resets ... Sessions are stored as hashes, so a database dump contains nothing that can be pasted into a browser. A login that has passed the password but not the second factor is modelled as a pending session: it expires, is revocable, and reaches exactly one endpoint. Signup is invite-only and takes the email address from the invite rather than the form, so a link cannot be redirected to somebody else. The first admin is created by an endpoint that refuses once any account exists, checked and inserted in one transaction because it is necessarily unauthenticated. Login failures and forgotten-password requests answer identically whether or not the address has an account — otherwise the form is an account-existence oracle. Password rules are a length floor and nothing else: composition rules push people towards worse passwords. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-16 23:31:29 +02:00