Du spurgte, hvad der sker med bilag og indsatte billeder. Svaret var: de forsvandt
stille. Scriptet konverterede til ren tekst, og en note fra Apple Noter, der kommer
over som ord alene, er ikke den note — den er et referat af den.
En note kan nu bære filer, i samme tabel som opgaver og grupper allerede bruger.
Filerne er indholdsadresserede og deduplikeres på disken, upload-vejen er skrevet
og afprøvet, og oprydningen af forældreløse filer går allerede den tabel igennem.
En tabel mere ville være et alt-sammen mere.
Importen læser arkivet i to omgange. Alt, der ikke er Markdown, gemmes først, så
en note, der bliver læst, allerede har adresser at få sine links rettet til —
noter og billeder ligger i den rækkefølge, arkivet nu har dem, og ét gennemløb
ville efterlade halvdelen af henvisningerne pegende på ingenting.
Kun de filer, noten faktisk nævner. Et arkiv er én mappe til mange noter, og at
hænge hvert billede på hver note ville gøre hundrede noter til ti tusind bilag.
Hentningen af en note-fil gav 404, fordi adgangskontrollen ikke kendte noter som
forælder. Et billede midt i den tekst, der navngav det, svarede altså "findes
ikke". Den følger nu noten, som følger sit projekt — samme kæde som alt andet.
AppleScriptet gemmer nu hver vedhæftning og skriver en henvisning til den i noten.
Vedhæftninger uden fil bag sig — links til websider, kort — springes over frem for
at vælte kørslen.
Migration 0021.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
It was a heading over some rows: a name, a colour, and whether it was folded.
Enough to tidy a list, and not enough to be what people mean by it — "Arbejde" is
a body of work with context of its own, and documents that belong to all of it
rather than to any one project inside it.
`/gruppe/{id}` carries three things a heading cannot. The projects in it, each
with what is still open — open tasks, not all of them, because "12" beside a
project somebody finished last year is a number that means nothing. A description,
written in place and saved on blur, the same shape a task's description has. And
the files that govern the whole group: the contract, the drawing, the agreement
everything else rests on.
The name in the sidebar is a link to it and the chevron beside it still folds.
Two intentions, two targets — the single one they used to share could only ever
serve the smaller.
Migration 0012 rebuilds `attachments`, because its CHECK spelled out exactly which
parent columns may be set and SQLite cannot alter a CHECK. The rule is still
"exactly one parent", counted rather than written out as pairwise comparisons:
with three columns that is three clauses, with four it is six, and the version
that is wrong looks exactly like the one that is right.
A group's file is reachable by its owner and nobody else. A group belongs to one
person and is never shared, so `reachAttachment` asks about ownership rather than
a project role — both old callers resolved straight to a task, so a group's
attachment answered 404 for the person who uploaded it.
Three tests also stopped racing their own navigation. Creating a project navigates
and `goto` is a promise nobody was holding, so a quick add fired straight after
could land in the Inbox instead — intermittent, and it read as the quick add
having failed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Comments and attachments close out phase 2. Files are stored
content-addressed by hash, so the path never contains anything the
uploader chose — a filename is attacker-controlled text, and building a
path from it is how "../" becomes a write outside the data directory.
Everything downloads as application/octet-stream: an uploaded SVG served
inline would run its own script on this origin with the session cookie
attached.
Web Push is written directly against RFC 8030/8291/8292 rather than
pulled in — it is three specs' worth of well-defined crypto and about
two hundred lines, and the alternatives carry a JWT and crypto stack
each larger than the file.
Phase 4 imports Todoist's CSV and exports it back. Todoist numbers
priorities the opposite way to how it displays them — its 4 is P1 — so
the two are converted rather than copied; getting it backwards silently
inverts the urgency of every imported task. Nesting is positional, so
the reader keeps an indent stack and the writer never sorts.
The round trip is tested as the brief asks: a CSV in, out, and back
produces an identical project, and two exports of one project are
byte-identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
