Three reports from somebody driving the app through the MCP connector,
all the same shape: an argument accepted, an OK returned, and nothing
done.
**project_id on an update never moved the task.** Both the REST handler
and the MCP tool read it, both checked the caller's rights on the
destination — which reads as "understood" — and then neither passed it
on, because store.TaskUpdate has no such field: a project change is a
move, since sort_order is per project. So the task stayed where it was
and the answer said OK. Moving a task between projects was impossible
except by creating it again and closing the old one, which is what the
person ended up doing. Both paths now go through one helper, so they
cannot drift apart again.
**An unknown #project vanished without a word.** The parser reads
"#3Dekoration" correctly; the lookup then fails, the task goes to the
Inbox, and the name is gone from the title with nothing anywhere saying
why. Still not an error — a thought should not be thrown away over a typo
— but quick-add now returns unknown_project, and the MCP tool returns a
note written for a model to relay. The old behaviour was kind in the web
interface, where you see the row appear in the wrong place and fix it. In
a chat nobody sees the row.
**Sub-tasks were unreachable over MCP.** create_task had no parent_id,
though the REST API has had it all along, so importing a parent with
seven children produced eight unrelated tasks with the parent's name
prefixed onto each. A sub-task joins its parent's project — the two
cannot disagree — and a second level is refused rather than silently
flattened.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Projects have carried sort_order since the first migration and nothing
ever set it, so the sidebar was ordered by creation date for good.
POST /projects/reorder takes the whole list rather than one move. A
person has a handful of projects, so sending the order you want is
simpler to reason about than midpoints between neighbours — and it cannot
run out of precision, which is the failure the task ordering has to
respace a section to recover from. It also cannot land half-applied the
way a sequence of individual moves can.
Projects you do not own are skipped rather than refused. sort_order is a
column on the project, not a preference per viewer, so a shared project
sits where its owner put it and a member rearranging their own sidebar
does not rearrange somebody else's. The sidebar only makes your own
projects draggable, so that rule never shows up as a row that springs
back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A project could be created and shared and never renamed or deleted. Both
have worked through the API since the beginning; there was simply nothing
to click.
The heading is now the field — a heading that happens to be editable
rather than a form that looks like one — and saves on blur, with Escape
putting the old name back. Owner only, and the Inbox keeps its plain
heading because it cannot be either renamed away or deleted.
Deleting needed more than a button. It is soft, with thirty days to
change your mind, and restoring has been possible the whole time — from
an id, which is exactly what you no longer have once the project has gone
from the screen. A recovery window nobody can reach is not one. So
GET /trash/projects lists what you have deleted, with how many tasks went
with it and how long is left, and Settings → Data has the button.
Owned, not shared: a member of a project somebody else deleted has no
business bringing it back, and there is a test that says so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"I have updated and restarted, but I cannot tell whether it worked" is
not a question the panel could answer. The version was on the startup
line and in the settings page, and nowhere you can reach from outside.
/healthz carries it now. That is the one endpoint answering without a
session, which makes it the only way to ask the question from a terminal
or from the panel itself. The "listening" line repeats it too, because
that is the line the Rune's done_regex matches and therefore the one
sitting at the bottom of the console after a deploy.
The update notice could also never have worked. It reads GitHub's
releases/latest, and this repository had only tags — a tag is not a
release, and that endpoint answers 404 for a repository without any. The
release workflow creates one now, after the image is pushed so a release
never announces a version that failed to build.
VERDANDE_UPDATE_CHECK is a Rune variable, so it can be switched on
without editing the container. Still off by default: it is an outbound
request, and that is a choice to make rather than a default to inherit.
Rune version 1 -> 2, so the panel offers the update.
Note that the check still cannot see anything while the repository is
private — releases/latest is 404 anonymously, exactly as the GHCR package
was. Making the repo public, or teaching the check to carry a token, is a
separate decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two bugs with one shape: the interface confidently told you something
that was not so.
Connecting Gmail without a registered OAuth client said "Det er der
allerede." Thirteen different situations answered a plain `conflict`, and
the frontend renders that as "that already exists" — which for four of
them is not vague but wrong. An unconfigured Gmail is not a Gmail that is
already connected; a second factor that is off is not one that is on; the
Inbox is not a project that already exists somewhere else. Those four
have their own codes now, and their own sentences.
The mail-to-task address came out as todo+…@localhost. VERDANDE_SMTP_FROM
defaults to verdande@localhost and the domain was taken from it
unconditionally, so an instance with no mail server handed out an address
that looks real, can never receive anything, and gives no hint which of
the two it is. The default no longer wins over the public hostname, and
the response now carries whether a mail server exists at all — because
even with the right domain, nothing routes to it until one does.
errors.go has always claimed the code list is kept in one place "so the
frontend's mapping can be checked against it". Nothing checked it, and
the mapping was missing bad_request. Now a test reads both files and
fails on a code with no message.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
verdande could not be added to Claude at all. The documented setup —
POST /api/v1/mcp with an Authorization header — cannot be configured from
Claude's custom-connector dialog, which asks for a name, a URL and OAuth
client credentials and has no field for a bearer token. The instructions
described something the interface does not offer.
Worse, the obvious guess failed silently in the most misleading way
available: /mcp was not a route, so the SPA fallback answered 200 with a
page of HTML. The connector reported a successful connection and then
failed to parse the response, which reads as a broken client rather than
a missing endpoint.
So /mcp exists now and takes its credential in the query string, exactly
as the calendar feed does and for the same reason: a client that cannot
be told to send a header means the address is the credential. The
request logger records paths without their query strings, so the key does
not reach the log.
It is deliberately outside /api/v1 and accepts the key and nothing else.
Reading a session cookie here would make it a state-changing POST outside
the CSRF check — a cross-site request that acts as whoever is signed in —
and there is a test that fails if that ever becomes true.
The API path is unchanged for anything that can send a header. The tokens
page now shows the connector address next to the token it belongs to,
since that is the one moment the token exists.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The brief asked for one. docs/api.md is complete and hand-written, and
there was nothing a tool could read.
Written by hand rather than generated from annotations, which would have
meant every handler carrying a second copy of itself in a comment. The
risk with a hand-written spec is that it goes stale, so it does not
depend on anybody remembering: openapi_test.go walks the chi router and
fails both on a route nothing describes and on a description with no
route behind it. CI separately checks it is a valid OpenAPI document.
The test reads the file with a forty-line scanner rather than pulling in
a YAML library. It needs two things — which paths are listed and which
methods each has — and both sit at fixed indentation in a document the
test also owns, which is worth more than a dependency in a project whose
whole shape is one static binary.
The CalDAV routes are excluded deliberately: PROPFIND and REPORT are
outside what OpenAPI can describe, and docs/caldav.md covers them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
