Spørgsmålet var, om modtageren ikke burde godkende først. Svaret er nej — men
det, spørgsmålet fik øje på, var rigtigt, og værre end det lød.
Tre ting gjaldt samtidig: man blev tilføjet uden at blive spurgt, man fik ikke
besked, og man kunne ikke gå ud igen. En delt note gav en klokkebesked; et delt
projekt gav ingenting — det stod bare i sidebjælken næste gang, man kiggede,
uden at noget sagde hvornår eller fra hvem. Og handleRemoveMember lå bag
ejer-kravet, så kun ejeren kunne fjerne nogen, også en selv.
Hvert enkelt af de tre er til at leve med. Alle tre sammen gør en deling til
noget, der sker for en.
Ikke et godkendelsestrin: en invitation, der venter på et ja, betyder, at den,
der delte, tror det er gjort, mens arbejdet ligger stille — og noter deles
allerede uden. Det, der manglede, var besked og en udgang.
`project.shared` er ny. Klokkens follow() kunne allerede føre et project_id hen
til projektet, så beskeden bærer sit eget mål og krævede ingen særregel.
Ruten til at fjerne et medlem er flyttet ud af ejer-gruppen, og handleren skiller
nu de to ting ad: ejeren, der fjerner nogen, og den, der selv går. At pege på en
andens medlemskab uden at eje projektet svarer 404 og ikke 403 — "det må du
ikke" bekræfter, at medlemskabet findes. Ejeren kan stadig ikke gå fra sit eget
projekt; det ville være en overdragelse, og den findes ikke endnu.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Et projekt kunne kun deles ved at stave en e-mailadresse. Det er den forkerte
vej at spørge om en kollega, man kender navnet på og sidder i samme rum som —
og beslutningen om, hvorvidt en instans' konti må vises for hinanden, var
allerede taget: `UsersForSharing` har gjort det for noter hele tiden, med
begrundelsen skrevet ved siden af. Der er ingen åben oprettelse, så konti er en
lukket, inviteret mængde, og det er en adressebog frem for en udlevering.
Projekterne bruger nu den samme.
`GET /members` svarer med tre lister frem for én, så panelet åbner færdigt i ét
kald — samme form som notens delingspanel. `POST /invites` tager `user_id` ved
siden af `email`, og de to veje mødes ét sted: en adresse, der viser sig at høre
til en konto, ER den konto, og skal ikke gennem en oprettelsesside, den ikke kan
komme igennem.
De ventende invitationer kom med, fordi den nye liste skabte behovet for dem:
den, der er inviteret og ikke kommet, har ingen konto og står derfor hverken
blandt medlemmerne eller blandt dem, man kan vælge. Før betød det, at man ikke
kunne se sin egen invitation; nu ville det betyde, at man leder efter en person,
der mangler i listen, og inviterer igen. Det andet link virker lige så godt som
det første. De kan trækkes tilbage, for ellers er den ventende liste kun til at
se på.
Tre ting, der kostede en kørsel hver:
`OpenAPI is valid` fangede den nye DELETE-rute, før jeg selv gjorde.
To felter hed "Rolle" på den samme side. Det er ikke kun en prøve, der brokker
sig — en skærmlæser siger "Rolle" to gange uden at kunne skelne. De har nu hver
sin tilstand og hvert sit navn, og den gamle prøves `getByLabel('Rolle')` er
blevet `exact`, fordi den matchede som understreng.
Og e2e-prøven lånte først sin anden person fra prøven ovenfor. Det så jeg kun,
fordi jeg kørte den alene: basen tømmes for hver kørsel, så en prøve, der kun
består, når hele filen kører i rækkefølge, består ikke af sine egne grunde. Den
laver nu selv sin — og viser dermed skiftet: den samme person er først en
ventende adresse og bagefter et navn, der kan vælges.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rækkefølgen af sektioner *er* planen — "Planlægning" står før "I gang", fordi det
er den vej arbejdet går — og indtil nu kunne den kun laves om ved at slette en
sektion og lave den igen, hvilket smider dens opgaver ud i det usektionerede
område på vejen.
Hele overskriften er håndtaget. En sektionsoverskrift indeholder ikke noget, der
selv bliver trukket, så der er ingen geste at stjæle — hvilket er grunden til, at
sidebjælkens rækker skulle have et greb, og grunden til at disse ikke skal. Ikke
draggable mens den omdøbes: et draggable element lader ikke markøren vælge tekst
i det felt, det indeholder.
Serversiden er hele listen på én gang som projekter og grupper, og af samme
grund: et projekt har en håndfuld sektioner, så 0, 1, 2 … er én lille transaktion
uden præcision at løbe tør for, og en liste kan ikke ende halvt anvendt.
`ReorderSections` er scopet til projektet og ikke til en ejer — en sektion har
ingen ejer, den hører til et projekt, og om du må rykke rundt er et spørgsmål om
det projekt, som handleren allerede har stillet. Id'er fra et andet projekt
springes over af WHERE-klausulen; der er en prøve på præcis det, fordi ingenting
ellers kontrollerer id'erne enkeltvis.
Båndet stod fire pixels skævt. Det var trukket ud med --s2 og polstret med --s3 —
samme idé gjort med to forskellige tal — så det blev otte pixels bredere end
listen i hver side, og teksten landede fire pixels uden for den kolonne, rækkerne
holder. Til venstre var det usynligt. Til højre var det Omdøb og Slet, der stod
fire pixels forbi alt over og under sig, hvilket er præcis langt nok til at ligne
en fejl og ikke langt nok til at se hvorfor. En række er `.row` med
`padding: var(--s2)` inde i en boks uden, så båndet har nu samme polstring og
ingen margen.
Board-visningen er ikke rørt: der er kolonnerne vandrette, og det er en anden
geste.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reported as "sections can only have one task", and that is exactly what it looked
like.
TaskList read the dragged task from its own `draggingId`, which is only set when
the drag *started* in that list. A task dragged in from the unsectioned rows above,
or from another section, arrived as null and the handler returned early — after it
had already called `stopPropagation`, so the section around it never got the drop
either.
So a section could only be dropped into while it was empty, because an empty one
has no row in the way to swallow the drop. Put one task in and there was no route
to a second. The id comes out of `dataTransfer` at drop time now, and `dragover`
decides with `carries()` rather than local state — which is the only thing a target
can read while a drag is in the air.
The stuck frame was the same cause: the section's own cleanup never ran, so the
highlight stayed lit after the drop. It is cleared on `dragend` now, which fires
once per drag on the source and bubbles to the window — the one place that is true
however a drag ends, including one abandoned with Escape, which produces no drop at
all and left the frame standing too.
The smoke test drops a second task onto the row already in the section, which is
the gesture that did nothing, and runs in WebKit as well.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The field was declared on the request type, commented on it, and applied by the
update handler — and the create handler never read it. Creating a project into a
group answered 201 and put it nowhere. A field that is accepted and discarded is
worse than one that is refused: nothing reports it.
Found by looking at a screenshot. Both groups stood empty while the projects sat
loose above them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An invite sent with the wrong role could not be corrected. The only way
back was to remove the person and invite them again — and removing a member
unassigns every task they were responsible for, so fixing a dropdown cost
somebody their work. This is the other side of "an external user cannot
create tasks": the rule was right, the role was wrong, and there was no way
to say so.
PATCH against a membership that already exists, not the upsert AddMember
does. Somebody who is not a member is not silently made one: that is an
invite, it belongs to the invite flow, and doing it here would let a typo
in a user id add a stranger to a project without anybody being asked.
The owner is refused, with the real reason rather than the true but useless
one. Ownership lives on the project rather than in project_members, so the
plain answer would have been "not a member" — which is correct and tells
nobody anything. Ownership is transferred, not granted, and two owners is a
state with no way to settle a disagreement about who may remove whom.
In the list, the owner's standing is text and everybody else's is a
dropdown. A disabled control would be a thing that exists to say no.
And the roles are finally in Danish. The API's words are `owner`, `editor`
and `viewer`, and they were being printed straight into a Danish page; the
list now uses the same three phrases the invite form beside it already did.
The smoke test drives both browsers, because the interesting part is that
the other one's permissions really change: a viewer is told the project is
read-only and has no quick-add box, the owner promotes them from the list,
and after a reload the box is there and the notice is gone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four things you could not do to a task you had open, and one that had
never worked at all.
**Project, recurrence and assignee** are now fields in the drawer. A task
created in the wrong place could only be fixed by dragging it, a repeat
could only be set by typing it into the title when the task was created,
and delegation had no interface whatsoever despite assignee_id being in
the API from the start. The assignee only appears on a project with
somebody else in it, because on your own there is nobody to choose.
**The title is read the way quick add reads it.** Typing "i morgen kl 14
p1" into a title used to leave it as those words, so where you typed a
sentence decided what it meant. The parse runs on the server — the
grammar is Danish and English and lives there — and applies only when it
consumed something. What it took is said out loud, and the fields on
screen are updated to match: the drawer otherwise seeds its inputs once
per task so a save cannot overwrite what you are typing, and that rule
has to bend exactly here, where the save changed the very fields in front
of you.
**And the member list has never worked.** The share panel, and now the
assignee field, ask for it. Every call errored: the ORDER BY named an
expression, and SQLite only accepts result-set columns across a UNION, so
it failed at query time with "1st ORDER BY term does not match any column
in the result set". Found by the smoke test that opens a task, which is
the second real bug that suite has caught by watching for failed requests
rather than only for what renders.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Projects have carried sort_order since the first migration and nothing
ever set it, so the sidebar was ordered by creation date for good.
POST /projects/reorder takes the whole list rather than one move. A
person has a handful of projects, so sending the order you want is
simpler to reason about than midpoints between neighbours — and it cannot
run out of precision, which is the failure the task ordering has to
respace a section to recover from. It also cannot land half-applied the
way a sequence of individual moves can.
Projects you do not own are skipped rather than refused. sort_order is a
column on the project, not a preference per viewer, so a shared project
sits where its owner put it and a member rearranging their own sidebar
does not rearrange somebody else's. The sidebar only makes your own
projects draggable, so that rule never shows up as a row that springs
back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A project could be created and shared and never renamed or deleted. Both
have worked through the API since the beginning; there was simply nothing
to click.
The heading is now the field — a heading that happens to be editable
rather than a form that looks like one — and saves on blur, with Escape
putting the old name back. Owner only, and the Inbox keeps its plain
heading because it cannot be either renamed away or deleted.
Deleting needed more than a button. It is soft, with thirty days to
change your mind, and restoring has been possible the whole time — from
an id, which is exactly what you no longer have once the project has gone
from the screen. A recovery window nobody can reach is not one. So
GET /trash/projects lists what you have deleted, with how many tasks went
with it and how long is left, and Settings → Data has the button.
Owned, not shared: a member of a project somebody else deleted has no
business bringing it back, and there is a test that says so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
