Two themes and a toggle between them. Now five, chosen from a grid under
Settings → Konto: the two that existed, a warm dark (Skumring) with amber
where the green was, a warm light (Papir), and a high-contrast one.
Each swatch is painted in its own theme rather than described, so the
choice is made by looking. data-theme sits on the swatch and not on the
card — it redefines --ink too, and a card wearing a dark theme's ink on a
light page has a name nobody can read.
Every theme states its full palette rather than inheriting and patching.
A partial theme looks finished until somebody adds a token, at which
point four themes silently fall back to a colour from a fifth. That is
also why the dark palette is repeated under [data-theme='dark']: :root
carries it as the default and :root only ever matches <html>, so a swatch
asking for it by name would otherwise show whatever the page was wearing.
The theme-color meta is updated too, so an installed PWA's frame and a
phone's address bar follow rather than staying whichever colour shipped
in the markup.
Contrast measured for all five. The new ones clear 4.5:1 down to the
quietest tier — which is where dates and counts live, and the first thing
to disappear. Kontrast reaches 8.9:1 there. The two original themes are
left as they are: their faint ink sits at 3.1–3.8, which is worth
revisiting, but not as a side effect of adding colours.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The socket carried task events and nothing else, so a project or a label
created anywhere — another tab, another device, Claude through the
connector — did not appear until a reload. Tasks updated live and the
sidebar did not, which reads as the sidebar being broken rather than as a
gap in what is published.
Projects and labels go to the *user* rather than to a project. A project
that has just been created has no subscribers, because nobody was
watching a thing that did not exist a moment ago.
Labels are announced as "something changed" and re-read, rather than sent
as a payload. The sidebar wants each label's task count, which no single
event carries and which moves whenever a task gains or loses a label —
including through quick add, where "@regnskab" invents the label inside a
task write and no label event is sent at all. Comparing the label lists
on a task change is what catches that, without re-reading on every ticked
checkbox.
And projects now go through an upsert, because the same row arrives twice
— once as the response to the request that created it, once over the
socket. Appending both puts two ids into a keyed {#each}, which throws
and stops the sidebar rendering. The tasks already had that guard; adding
the project event without it reintroduced the identical bug, and the
smoke test caught it on the first run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The sidebar was 268px and always there. On a wide monitor that wastes the
room; on a laptop it takes room the list needs.
The width drags from a handle on the border — 7px of target over a 1px
line, because a 1px target is a target you miss — and the whole column
folds away from a button in the topbar. Both are remembered.
In localStorage rather than on the account: this is a property of the
screen you are sitting at, not of you. The same person on a laptop and a
wide monitor wants different answers, and syncing it would make one of
them wrong every time they switch.
The handle is also a slider for the keyboard. Arrow keys move it, Home
puts it back, and so does a double-click — a drag handle with no keyboard
equivalent is a setting some people simply cannot reach.
Folding is desktop-only, and the media query says so rather than leaving
it to chance: below the breakpoint the sidebar is a drawer that opens over
the page, and a collapsed drawer would open to nothing. Clamped to
200–480px in the store, so a stored value from an older build cannot make
it unusable either.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Projects have carried sort_order since the first migration and nothing
ever set it, so the sidebar was ordered by creation date for good.
POST /projects/reorder takes the whole list rather than one move. A
person has a handful of projects, so sending the order you want is
simpler to reason about than midpoints between neighbours — and it cannot
run out of precision, which is the failure the task ordering has to
respace a section to recover from. It also cannot land half-applied the
way a sequence of individual moves can.
Projects you do not own are skipped rather than refused. sort_order is a
column on the project, not a preference per viewer, so a shared project
sits where its owner put it and a member rearranging their own sidebar
does not rearrange somebody else's. The sidebar only makes your own
projects draggable, so that rule never shows up as a row that springs
back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ticking a task off never removed its row. The optimistic update ran, the
request went out, the server answered 200 — and the view did not move.
The same applied to a change arriving over the websocket, which is how
somebody else's edit was supposed to show up. It had never worked.
The common factor was tasks[i] = value. push and whole-array assignment
both reached the views; index assignment did not. Rather than depend on
which mutations the reactivity happens to see through, every write now
goes through app.replace() or app.upsert(), which build a new array. The
lists are at most a few hundred rows and the copy is not worth a moment's
thought next to the class of bug it removes.
upsert exists because the same task arrives twice: once as the response
to the request that created it, and once over the socket, which publishes
to the whole project including whoever did it. Either can land first, and
appending both puts two rows with one id into a keyed {#each} — not a
duplicated row but a thrown error that stops the view rendering.
complete, reopen and update were three copies of the same twenty lines;
they are now one private helper.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The interface for phase 1: sign-in and first-run setup, Today, Upcoming,
project views, sharing, Cmd+K search and the keyboard shortcuts.
Quick add highlights what the parser understood underneath the text as
you type — a mirrored layer behind a transparent input, sliced by byte
offset because the server counts bytes and JavaScript counts UTF-16
units, which disagree on exactly the Danish letters this app is full of.
Every local action is optimistic and reconciled afterwards: ticking a
task off strikes it through and animates it out before the request
leaves, and rolls back with a message if the server disagrees.
The Content-Security-Policy is computed at startup by hashing the inline
scripts in the built index.html. Both of them change on every frontend
build, so a hard-coded hash would go stale silently and show up only as
a blank page in production. The alternative, 'unsafe-inline', would drop
the one protection that makes an injected script in a task title inert.
Today is derived from the store by date rather than from the ids that
came back with the first request — filtering against a captured list
meant a task added through quick add never appeared until a reload.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
