Rækkefølgen af sektioner *er* planen — "Planlægning" står før "I gang", fordi det
er den vej arbejdet går — og indtil nu kunne den kun laves om ved at slette en
sektion og lave den igen, hvilket smider dens opgaver ud i det usektionerede
område på vejen.
Hele overskriften er håndtaget. En sektionsoverskrift indeholder ikke noget, der
selv bliver trukket, så der er ingen geste at stjæle — hvilket er grunden til, at
sidebjælkens rækker skulle have et greb, og grunden til at disse ikke skal. Ikke
draggable mens den omdøbes: et draggable element lader ikke markøren vælge tekst
i det felt, det indeholder.
Serversiden er hele listen på én gang som projekter og grupper, og af samme
grund: et projekt har en håndfuld sektioner, så 0, 1, 2 … er én lille transaktion
uden præcision at løbe tør for, og en liste kan ikke ende halvt anvendt.
`ReorderSections` er scopet til projektet og ikke til en ejer — en sektion har
ingen ejer, den hører til et projekt, og om du må rykke rundt er et spørgsmål om
det projekt, som handleren allerede har stillet. Id'er fra et andet projekt
springes over af WHERE-klausulen; der er en prøve på præcis det, fordi ingenting
ellers kontrollerer id'erne enkeltvis.
Båndet stod fire pixels skævt. Det var trukket ud med --s2 og polstret med --s3 —
samme idé gjort med to forskellige tal — så det blev otte pixels bredere end
listen i hver side, og teksten landede fire pixels uden for den kolonne, rækkerne
holder. Til venstre var det usynligt. Til højre var det Omdøb og Slet, der stod
fire pixels forbi alt over og under sig, hvilket er præcis langt nok til at ligne
en fejl og ikke langt nok til at se hvorfor. En række er `.row` med
`padding: var(--s2)` inde i en boks uden, så båndet har nu samme polstring og
ingen margen.
Board-visningen er ikke rørt: der er kolonnerne vandrette, og det er en anden
geste.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"Hvorfor står der 2 ud for et tomt projekt?" Fordi tallet var member_count — hvor
mange mennesker. Den samme grå kolonne betød tre ting: personer ved projekter,
projekter ved grupper, opgaver ved etiketter. I en opgaveapp læses et tal ved
siden af et projekt som opgaver, og det gjorde manden, der har skrevet appen.
Nu er det åbne opgaver, og det vises når der er noget tilbage frem for når
projektet er delt — som var den gamle betingelse, og grunden til at netop de tre
delte havde et tal. Hvem der ellers er med står på projektets egen side.
Tællingen hentes fra serveren igen, når opgaver flytter sig. Det ville være
hurtigere at lægge til og trække fra lokalt, og det ville være forkert inden for
en dag: en opgave flyttet mellem projekter, en lukket i en anden fane, en
gentagende der lukker og åbner sig selv.
Og sidebjælken kunne allerede foldes — der var bare kun en knap med et rektangel
med en streg i, og det er ikke et ord. Nu gør ⌘B det samme, knappen siger det, og
genvejssiden nævner det.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The box at the top puts things in the project with no section, which is right for
capturing. But a project has sections because the work belongs somewhere, and
dragging every new task down into the right one is a second gesture for something
you already knew when you typed it.
Two ways in, because they answer different moments. A field at the foot of each
section and each board column — standing there is enough, no syntax to know. And
`/section` in quick add, for the box at the top and for Today and Upcoming, where
you are not standing in a section at all.
The field goes through quick add rather than createTask, so a line written there
still parses its dates, priorities and labels.
The sigil needed care: '#' and '@' never turn up in a Danish task line by accident
and '/' turns up constantly. It has to follow whitespace and be followed
immediately by the name, which "km/t", "3/4" and "20 kr / stk" all fail. The bare
form is greedy, because "Kunder/Ordrer" is a real section name and the sigil is
inside it.
A section id from the client is checked against the project the task actually
landed in. A `#project` in the same line can move the task elsewhere, and the id
would otherwise follow it into a project that section does not belong to.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An invite sent with the wrong role could not be corrected. The only way
back was to remove the person and invite them again — and removing a member
unassigns every task they were responsible for, so fixing a dropdown cost
somebody their work. This is the other side of "an external user cannot
create tasks": the rule was right, the role was wrong, and there was no way
to say so.
PATCH against a membership that already exists, not the upsert AddMember
does. Somebody who is not a member is not silently made one: that is an
invite, it belongs to the invite flow, and doing it here would let a typo
in a user id add a stranger to a project without anybody being asked.
The owner is refused, with the real reason rather than the true but useless
one. Ownership lives on the project rather than in project_members, so the
plain answer would have been "not a member" — which is correct and tells
nobody anything. Ownership is transferred, not granted, and two owners is a
state with no way to settle a disagreement about who may remove whom.
In the list, the owner's standing is text and everybody else's is a
dropdown. A disabled control would be a thing that exists to say no.
And the roles are finally in Danish. The API's words are `owner`, `editor`
and `viewer`, and they were being printed straight into a Danish page; the
list now uses the same three phrases the invite form beside it already did.
The smoke test drives both browsers, because the interesting part is that
the other one's permissions really change: a viewer is told the project is
read-only and has no quick-add box, the owner promotes them from the list,
and after a reload the box is there and the notice is gone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The three the handoff named as next. They are one commit because they are
one mechanism: all three end in something being dragged, and a drop target
cannot tell what is coming without the module they now share.
Groups are foldable headings over the projects in the sidebar. A table
rather than a `group_name` column on the project, because a group has to
be renamable in one write, has to survive being emptied, and has to
remember whether it is folded — none of which a string repeated on every
project row can do.
Folded state lives on the row, not in localStorage. The sidebar's *width*
is a property of the screen you are sitting at, which is why that one is
per browser; a folded group is a statement about the group — "this is the
part of my work I am not in right now" — and it is true on the laptop and
on the desktop. There is nobody else's answer to disagree with either: a
group belongs to exactly one person.
A shared project cannot be filed. `group_id` is a column on the project
row, so a member grouping somebody else's project would move it in the
owner's sidebar too — the same reason `sort_order` is owner-scoped. The
listing reports the column only to the owner, so a viewer is never told
where somebody else keeps it.
Deleting a group takes the heading and leaves the projects, and the
sidebar decides where a project renders by whether its group still
exists rather than by the id alone. A group deleted in another tab
arrives as one event and not one per project, so for a moment the
projects still name a heading that is no longer drawn — filing by the raw
id would drop them out of the sidebar entirely.
Kommende gains the month grid the project pages already had, behind a
Liste/Kalender toggle. The two views ask for different things — seven days
from today against six whole weeks around an arbitrary month — so each
loads its own, and the grid reports which dates it is showing rather than
having the page guess. Which view is remembered in localStorage: a month
of seven columns needs room, and the answer on a phone is not the answer
on a wide monitor.
And a task can now be dropped on a project in the sidebar, on a day in
Kommende, or on a cell in any month grid. Onto a project it is a *move*,
not a field: `sort_order` belongs to the project, so it has to find a
place among that project's tasks and leave its old section behind.
Each drag now carries its own MIME type. `getData` is deliberately
unreadable while a drag is in the air — the browser hands the payload over
on drop and not before, so a page cannot read what is being dragged across
it — and `dataTransfer.types` is all a target has to decide with. Deciding
is the point: calling preventDefault on a drag you cannot accept is what
turns "no" into a silent, wrong drop. The sidebar takes a project and a
task on the same row and has to tell them apart.
Two things fell out of building it. The month grid has always had one cell
narrower than the other six: `.today` styled the "I dag" button in the
header, and the day cell for today wears the same class, so `margin-left:
auto` was shrinking a grid item to its content. It is scoped to the header
now. And a project page listed whatever was in the store rather than what
belonged to that project, which did not matter until a task could leave a
project while you were looking at it.
Covered by eight new API tests and two new smoke tests, and the smoke tests
drive the drags for real — the type check they exercise exists only while
a drag is in flight, so nothing else can reach it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four things you could not do to a task you had open, and one that had
never worked at all.
**Project, recurrence and assignee** are now fields in the drawer. A task
created in the wrong place could only be fixed by dragging it, a repeat
could only be set by typing it into the title when the task was created,
and delegation had no interface whatsoever despite assignee_id being in
the API from the start. The assignee only appears on a project with
somebody else in it, because on your own there is nobody to choose.
**The title is read the way quick add reads it.** Typing "i morgen kl 14
p1" into a title used to leave it as those words, so where you typed a
sentence decided what it meant. The parse runs on the server — the
grammar is Danish and English and lives there — and applies only when it
consumed something. What it took is said out loud, and the fields on
screen are updated to match: the drawer otherwise seeds its inputs once
per task so a save cannot overwrite what you are typing, and that rule
has to bend exactly here, where the save changed the very fields in front
of you.
**And the member list has never worked.** The share panel, and now the
assignee field, ask for it. Every call errored: the ORDER BY named an
expression, and SQLite only accepts result-set columns across a UNION, so
it failed at query time with "1st ORDER BY term does not match any column
in the result set". Found by the smoke test that opens a task, which is
the second real bug that suite has caught by watching for failed requests
rather than only for what renders.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Projects have carried sort_order since the first migration and nothing
ever set it, so the sidebar was ordered by creation date for good.
POST /projects/reorder takes the whole list rather than one move. A
person has a handful of projects, so sending the order you want is
simpler to reason about than midpoints between neighbours — and it cannot
run out of precision, which is the failure the task ordering has to
respace a section to recover from. It also cannot land half-applied the
way a sequence of individual moves can.
Projects you do not own are skipped rather than refused. sort_order is a
column on the project, not a preference per viewer, so a shared project
sits where its owner put it and a member rearranging their own sidebar
does not rearrange somebody else's. The sidebar only makes your own
projects draggable, so that rule never shows up as a row that springs
back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A project could be created and shared and never renamed or deleted. Both
have worked through the API since the beginning; there was simply nothing
to click.
The heading is now the field — a heading that happens to be editable
rather than a form that looks like one — and saves on blur, with Escape
putting the old name back. Owner only, and the Inbox keeps its plain
heading because it cannot be either renamed away or deleted.
Deleting needed more than a button. It is soft, with thirty days to
change your mind, and restoring has been possible the whole time — from
an id, which is exactly what you no longer have once the project has gone
from the screen. A recovery window nobody can reach is not one. So
GET /trash/projects lists what you have deleted, with how many tasks went
with it and how long is left, and Settings → Data has the button.
Owned, not shared: a member of a project somebody else deleted has no
business bringing it back, and there is a test that says so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Completes the MVP surface: project and section CRUD, task CRUD with
sub-trees, drag-and-drop ordering, the quick-add endpoint over the
natural-language parser, Today and Upcoming, search, sharing with roles,
an activity log and a WebSocket for live updates.
Permission checks are route middleware rather than a first line in each
handler, so an endpoint is guarded by where it sits instead of by the
author remembering. Anything the caller may not see answers 404, never
403 — a 403 confirms the thing exists. Visibility is enforced inside the
list query, so another user's project cannot be reached by filtering or
searching at it.
Ordering is a float, so a drop writes one row instead of renumbering the
list. When repeated drops into one gap exhaust the precision, the
section is spread out again and the move retried — in a separate
transaction, since the attempt that discovered the problem rolls back.
The connection pool is not 1: a single connection makes the pool a lock,
and a query run while an earlier result set is still open then waits for
a connection it is itself holding. The store now closes its rows before
querying again, and the pool leaves that mistake slow rather than fatal.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
