feat(tasks): write a task straight into a section

The box at the top puts things in the project with no section, which is right for
capturing. But a project has sections because the work belongs somewhere, and
dragging every new task down into the right one is a second gesture for something
you already knew when you typed it.

Two ways in, because they answer different moments. A field at the foot of each
section and each board column — standing there is enough, no syntax to know. And
`/section` in quick add, for the box at the top and for Today and Upcoming, where
you are not standing in a section at all.

The field goes through quick add rather than createTask, so a line written there
still parses its dates, priorities and labels.

The sigil needed care: '#' and '@' never turn up in a Danish task line by accident
and '/' turns up constantly. It has to follow whitespace and be followed
immediately by the name, which "km/t", "3/4" and "20 kr / stk" all fail. The bare
form is greedy, because "Kunder/Ordrer" is a real section name and the sigil is
inside it.

A section id from the client is checked against the project the task actually
landed in. A `#project` in the same line can move the task elsewhere, and the id
would otherwise follow it into a project that section does not belong to.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kristian Wind
2026-08-18 11:13:10 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 9cc7df69f0
commit 0dbf7a40bf
11 changed files with 463 additions and 9 deletions
+43
View File
@@ -560,3 +560,46 @@ func TestRecurrenceIsHighlighted(t *testing.T) {
t.Error("no span of kind repeat")
}
}
// A section, and the three shapes a slash takes in ordinary text.
//
// The sigil is the one that needed thinking about: '#' and '@' never occur in a
// Danish task line by accident, and '/' occurs constantly. What keeps it apart is
// that the slash must follow whitespace and the name must follow the slash with
// nothing in between — which "km/t", "3/4" and "20 kr / stk" all fail.
func TestASectionIsWrittenWithASlash(t *testing.T) {
for _, c := range []struct {
in string
section string
content string
}{
{"ring til Karpenhøj /Produktion", "Produktion", "ring til Karpenhøj"},
{"/Produktion ring til Karpenhøj", "Produktion", "ring til Karpenhøj"},
// A real section name with a slash in it. The bare form is greedy, so the
// whole thing comes across rather than stopping at the second slash.
{"nye poser /Kunder/Ordrer", "Kunder/Ordrer", "nye poser"},
{`nye poser /"Kunder og ordrer"`, "Kunder og ordrer", "nye poser"},
// Retyping is a correction, not two sections.
{"nye poser /Drift /Produktion", "Produktion", "nye poser"},
// And alongside everything else.
{"betal moms i morgen kl 10 p1 #Firma /Bogholderi", "Bogholderi", "betal moms"},
// The ways a slash shows up when nobody meant a section. None of them may
// produce one: the slash has to follow whitespace, and the name has to
// follow the slash with nothing between.
{"kør 80 km/t forbi", "", "kør 80 km/t forbi"},
{"20 kr / stk hos grossisten", "", "20 kr / stk hos grossisten"},
// "3/4" is a section to nobody and a date to a Dane — the 3rd of April —
// and the date parser is right to claim it. What matters here is only that
// it did not become a section.
{"læs 3/4 af rapporten", "", "læs af rapporten"},
} {
got := Parse(c.in, ref(t), "da")
if got.Section != c.section {
t.Errorf("Parse(%q).Section = %q, want %q", c.in, got.Section, c.section)
}
if got.Content != c.content {
t.Errorf("Parse(%q).Content = %q, want %q", c.in, got.Content, c.content)
}
}
}