2026-08-19 11:25:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
# Signing in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three ways in, and you can have all of them at once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## A password
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What the first account is created with. Nothing is emailed, nothing is registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
anywhere: the first person to open a fresh instance creates the administrator
|
|
|
|
|
|
account, and after that people arrive by invite link.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-13 17:52:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
## Being let into a project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two different situations, one panel — **the project's ⋯ menu → Share**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody who **already has an account here** you pick from a list by name. You do
|
|
|
|
|
|
not need to know their email address to share a project with a colleague whose
|
|
|
|
|
|
name you know. The accounts on an instance are a closed set — there is no open
|
|
|
|
|
|
signup, every one of them was invited — so listing them to each other is the
|
|
|
|
|
|
address book the feature needs, not a disclosure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody who is **not here yet** you invite by email. If the address turns out to
|
|
|
|
|
|
belong to an account it becomes an ordinary share straight away; otherwise it
|
|
|
|
|
|
becomes a link that creates their account and their membership at once. With no
|
|
|
|
|
|
mail server configured the link is shown in the panel instead of being sent, which
|
|
|
|
|
|
is the correct behaviour on a one-person instance rather than an error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-14 08:07:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
**You are told, and you can leave.** Being added to a project is not something
|
|
|
|
|
|
that happens to you quietly: the bell says who shared what, and the entry takes
|
|
|
|
|
|
you to the project. In the share panel, anybody who is not the owner has a *Leave
|
|
|
|
|
|
the project* button. That is deliberate rather than an approval step — an
|
|
|
|
|
|
invitation waiting on a yes means the person who shared thinks it is done while
|
|
|
|
|
|
the work sits still. What was wrong was the other three-quarters of it: you were
|
|
|
|
|
|
added without being asked, without being told, and with no way out except asking
|
|
|
|
|
|
the owner. The owner cannot leave their own project; that is a transfer of
|
|
|
|
|
|
ownership, and there is no transfer yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-13 17:52:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
An invitation that has not been taken up stays listed under the members, greyed,
|
|
|
|
|
|
with a × to withdraw it. Without that it is invisible — the person has no account,
|
|
|
|
|
|
so they are neither a member nor somebody you can pick — and the usual next move
|
|
|
|
|
|
is to send it a second time. The second link works exactly as well as the first,
|
|
|
|
|
|
and then there are two to keep track of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-19 11:25:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
## A code on top of it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Settings → Account → Two-factor.** An ordinary TOTP secret — any authenticator
|
|
|
|
|
|
app reads the QR code. Once it is on, the password alone is not enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery codes are shown once, when you turn it on. They are the way back if the
|
|
|
|
|
|
phone is gone, and they are not shown again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## A passkey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Settings → Account → Passkeys → Add a passkey.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A key on a device instead of a secret in your head. The private half never leaves
|
|
|
|
|
|
the device — a phone's secure element, a laptop's keychain, a hardware key — and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the signature is bound to the address it was made for, so a convincing copy of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
sign-in page at a different address gets nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give each one a name you will recognise later. *min bærbare* is what makes a list
|
|
|
|
|
|
of keys reviewable, and a list nobody can read is a list nobody revokes from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passkeys need the address in `VERDANDE_BASE_URL` to be a hostname. Browsers refuse
|
|
|
|
|
|
to make one for a bare IP address, so an instance reached at `http://192.168.1.10:8080`
|
|
|
|
|
|
will show the passkey section as unavailable rather than failing at the moment
|
|
|
|
|
|
somebody tries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
!!! note "One is enough, two is better"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lose the only device holding your only passkey and you are back to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
password. Keep the password, or register a second key — a phone as well as a
|
|
|
|
|
|
laptop.
|